Posts Tagged ‘Sasquatch’

SCIENTIFIC TITLE FOR BIGFOOT-GIGANTANTHROPUS CRYPTICUS

February 13, 2008

“Huge mysterious manlike beast” . Unofficial, but descriptive in Latin, and it may make fence-sitting scientists more comfortable  than the slang term

“Bigfoot”

Many will shorten this to “Crypticus” . (The mysterious one).Ten foot tall mystery primateTen foot tall mystery primateTen foot tall mystery primateTen foot tall mystery primate

If a body is ever found, this will make an easy name to  use.

 Jon-Erik Beckjord, BA,MBA Director, ICS  925-385-0422

Advertisements

DERANGED BIGFOOT EXPEDITION MEMBER CONTINUES TO CLAIM SHE WAS HIT ON HEAD WITH FLASHLIGHT

November 21, 2007

T*ra L. B*ker H*uki continues to claim expediti0n leader (sept 07) hit her on
the head with a flashlight.  She claims it was a plastic flashlight.

 One problem – the flashlight was big, metal, 3 lbs,  3 cell, and same kind as police carry.

Any such flashlight will leave deep bruises and bloody cuts.  Amador co. sheriff’s dept

found NO wounds, bruises, etc. 

 

She also said “He kept hitting me, he kept hitting me.” 

 In such case, there should have been multiple bruises and wounds. NONE WERE FOUND.

 

This woman has admitted to being suicidal, and a former meth-head. Lives in Happy Camp,CA.  A libel lawsuit is being prepared against her. 

 She is also said to have told followers of Thomas Biscardi that she had killed her own

father, in Coalinga,CA and had gotten off by pleading insanity. The ICS offers $50

reward for any details of this event, arrest and trial. 925-385-0422 

 

UC Berkeley

November 7, 2007

Note – on Nov 5, I contacted Dr. Chris Conroy
at the UC Berkeley Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. He is a mammalologist. Bears and primates are mammals. At no time whatever
did I ask him about Bigfoot, since I was sure he would shy away from the subject, and we did not discuss Bigfoot. He did not endorse
Bigfoot, since, Bigfoot is not proven to exist. That said,  we discussed the photos taken by Rick Jacobs 9/16 in PA with a game-cam,
above.  He said he and some people on his staff, had been discussing these. I asked him whether, ON BALANCE, the 2nd and 3rd
images were of a bear (carnivore) or a primate (in general.)  He mentioned, and I agree, that the last image showed ischial
callosities (calluses) on the buttocks, which bears do not  have, but primates often do have. We also discussed the leg structure
of chimps, and he said that on balance, he would choose a primate (such as a chimp) for the photos, rather than a bear.
I feel he is right. We discussed the thinner legs, the longer legs and how the forelimbs were longer than the rear limbs,
as in primates.  —  on 10/6, I got a recorded message indicating distress on his part over this, and I can only surmise he
has pressure from his boss at UC Berkeley, about making statements about BIGFOOT.  He made NO statements about
Bigfoot. Only about the issue of bear vs primate.  It is too bad he cannot follow the steps of DR JANE GOODALL AND
DR. GEORGE SHALLER , who have indicated an interest in the possibility of Bigfoot. As for his boss, the director of the
Museum, shame on you sir.

UC Berkeley scientist chooses primate over bear for strange Penna photos

November 6, 2007

Dr Chris Conroy, head of dept of Mammals at the UC Berkeley Museum of Vertebrate Zoology says that

if he had to choose between a bear and a primate, for the Rick Jacobs photo, that he would opt for primate, because it has

calluses on the buttocks. Bears do not have that.


He also noted the long legs, and that the forelimbs are longer than the hind limbs. It all adds up to not a bear.

What kind of primate he does not know, but it is similar to a chimp.


Released by the International Cryptozoological Society, Berkeley,CA

925-385-0422 Jon-Erik Beckjord, director

Photos see http://www.beckjord.com/bigfoot/